Image may contain: 2 people, people standing and indoor

The holding of the third cycle of the Philippines’ Universal Periodic Review (UPR) that took place on May 8, 2017 was notable for the FMA. Last year, FMA submitted two reports – one with Privacy International highlighting privacy rights in the country, and the other with the Association for Progressive Communications that tackled in general human rights in the digital environment.

The Commission on Human Rights (CHR) hosted a livestreaming of the Philippines’ UPR and FMA staff, along with other members of human rights organizations in the country, attended the said gathering.

We noted that it is the first time that a legislator, in the person of Senator Alan Peter Cayetano (who was Duterte’s vice presidential running mate in the last elections) reported on the state of human rights in the Philippines. We also noted that his sister, former Senator and now Congresswoman Pia Cayetano, was also present and responded on some issues relating to gender laws.

We were not surprised that the issue of extra judicial killings (EJKs) took center stage in the recommendations of the 109 countries that commented on the Philippines’ UPR. It just shows how other countries are aware of and are concerned about the reported killings in the Philippines as a result of the campaign against illegal drugs. Of course, Mr. Cayetano tried to debunk the issue of EJKs and said that the CHR has redefined what EJK means that is why people think that such exist in the country. He also chided media for reporting inaccurate and fake news that other countries picked up.

Other human rights violations, such as those committed in online spaces, are not any less than EJKs. There were some recommendations on combatting trafficking against women and children, putting a stop to child pornography, and ending violence against women, which all happen in offline and online spaces. These issues too deserve to be addressed by the Philippine government.

The UPR is a time for the Philippine government to reflect on what it has done and what it has not in terms of fulfilling its State obligation to promote, protect and fulfill the rights of its citizens. We can only hope that  the concerns expressed by other countries will be taken into consideration by the Philippine government, and that the recommendations will not just be noted but considered and acted upon. ###


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Related Posts

eVAW

FMA welcomes the filing of Senate Bills 180 and 1251

Pasay City – The Foundation for Media Alternatives (FMA) was invited by the Senate Committee  on Women, Children, Family Relations and Gender Equality as one of the resource persons during the second public hearing on Gender-based Read more…

Gender & ICT

FMA at Sida Annual Partners’ Meeting: Learning and sharing between and among partners

Quezon City – Last June 30, 2017, Save the Children PH led its SIDA Annual Partners’ Meeting, in B Hotel at Timog Avenue with the theme of ‘”Learning and sharing between and among partners gearing Read more…

Gender & ICT

Philippines in the UPR: Misrepresentations and Myopic Responses

This year, the Philippines is undergoing its third Universal Periodic Review (UPR) before the UN Human Rights Committee (HRC). The Foundation for Media Alternatives (FMA) submitted a UPR stakeholder report on the state of digital Read more…